A conversation on politics and sport
Welcome to the 2013 launch of DylanMalloch.com!
It’s great to be back for another year. To celebrate the occasion, I thought I’d give
a new format a go as a trial. My mate
Steve and I traded emails discussing Australian politics which then somehow
turned into a discussion on sport.
Enjoy!
Dylan:
I invite you to open the AFR today and have a look at an
article by Phil Coorey titled “PM: Open season on the Greens.”
It all started so well... |
In my humble opinion, this is a farce. You can basically sum it all up as
following: "The Greens approved every main policy element the federal
government put forward (carbon tax, mining tax, NDIS) but are now saying it was rubbish and Labor has walked
away from the deal. Yet, they’ll still provide support and supply.”
So, let me ask, what the hell has changed here? Other
than them now throwing pot shot insults at one another that would make Tamsyn
Lewis and Jana Pittman blush, nothing has changed in the slightest.
What’s the motivation here? Labor reckon they can get
more votes by distancing themselves from the Greens? Greens reckon they
can get more votes by attacking Labor?
All I know is that Tony Abbott is sitting in a lounge chair,
lighting a Cuban cigar, reclining in that same chair, calling over Peta Credlin
and saying, “It’s working,” before laughing manically like this.
Steve:
This is about as much of a breakup as NAB’s with the other big
banks. It just shows how totally unnecessary it was for Gillard to sign the
agreement with the Greens in the first place. There was no way the Greens
were ever going to disrupt supply or support Abbott in a no confidence motion
so she basically signed up to the right to have Green stink smeared all over
her without getting anything in return that she wouldn’t have got anyway.
What a deal.
It makes sense for the Greens to create the illusion of conflict with
Labor. As Gillard says in Coorey’s article, they have always been a
protest party. The certainly can’t go to their voters as the subservient
part of a coalition with the most hated Government since this one and expect their
vote to hold up.
Instead of open season on the Greens – it’s really open season on Labor.
Senior ministers retiring for the always laughable ‘family reasons’,
slapped around in the polls, dismissed and derided in the media, and now dumped
by Christine Milne (the ultimate insult). It will be interesting to see
how many sitting ALP members campaign with brochures and flyers containing no
party logo or mention of the word ‘Labor’ – always a sign of a party in
trouble.
Dylan:
Gina's wealth creation is simply staggering |
I’d forgotten all about the
cartoon Robin Hood! But the metaphor is quite apt given ‘Sir Robin’ built
his reputation on ‘stealing from the rich to give to the poor’, shades of the
so-called class warfare we’re seeing at the moment.
I’m curious as to where this
sudden preoccupation with successful people being required to pay their ‘fair
share’ comes from. I heard a good interview on ABC News Breakfast the
other day where an industry association rep defined a ‘fair share of tax’ as
‘what’s required under the law’. Otherwise, the definition of what’s fair
and what’s not fair is entirely subjective. It just becomes one person’s
opinion against another.
Speaking of this approach
though, it’s probably the thing that frustrates me the most right now about
political arguing. The notion that “Not only am I right, but anyone who
thinks otherwise is not just wrong, but stupid too.” K-Rudd pioneered
this with his whole “The alternative is to do nothing” rationale which had as
much chance of succeeding to win people over as Lindsay Lohan pleading to the
paparazzi to respect her privacy.
I wonder what has a bigger
chance of succeeding in September though. Labor winning the next election,
or this movie winning
an Oscar?
Steve:
Whoa – I cannot wait to see this
movie!
The class warfare is getting so out of
control it’s now spread to the AFL. Demetriou must have brought Wayne
Swan in as a consultant or something. Who else besides the ‘World’s
Greatest Treasurer’ would come up with a system of charging more for tickets to
AFL games involving successful teams? It’s only a matter of time before a
Downfall parody of this gets to half a million YouTube hits.
You’re right about the standard of
debate, but I don’t think it’s anything new. There are no real ‘glory
days’ of Federal Parliament. There is this bizarre movement to beatify
Paul Keating as some sort of legendary public performer on the basis of a
couple of memorable lines, but pretty much all he’s remembered for are visceral
insults that are worse than any of the barbs people are supposedly so fed up
with today. Case in point: The infamous Paul Keating Insult Archive.
For me the most frustrating part of
being a political observer is the phony nature of it all. They all seem
to hate the people on their own side more than their real opponents. We
saw John Howard prefer to go down with his ship rather than hand the wheel to
Costello. We’re now seeing literally dozens of Labor MPs willingly
torpedo their careers rather than turn to Rudd to limit the damage. Word
at the moment is that there is a Combet-Shorten or Shorten-Combet ticket that
has the numbers and is waiting for the right time to knock off Gillard.
How must those Caucus meetings go, do
you reckon? My guess is something like this.
Dylan:
I remember being midly
scandalized by Piggy’s death when I first saw that. Yeesh!
And you’re spot on about the AFL
and its laughable ‘tax’ on higher-profile clubs. The worst part is that
the biggest losers in this whole saga are the fans as they’ll be the ones
paying more. Furthermore, and this might be a sore spot for you, but to
charge more to Essendon games is disgraceful as they’re only a borderline
playoff team. It’s like Meatloaf coming out to Australia and charging
$400 a ticket. Sure, he’s one of the biggest names ever, but his singing
ability has devolved into this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZdiaFXW2U8
– check out 5:35 for the greatest part.
Speaking of sport, I’m in two
minds about the status of cricket. I reckon it’s no longer a top tier
Australian sport; rather, it’s “upper-mid tier”. By this I mean that, if
there’s no competition, cricket will attract good crowds and strong TV
audience. However, if it’s up against one of Australia’s big guns (League
and AFL) it’ll always be relegated to second place.
I noticed this when Channel 9
were already spruiking the NRL season back in the Boxing Day test… last
year! They were so desperate to flog NRL that they were advertising it in
the middle of the offseason while the first game was still four months
away. I guarantee you won’t see any ‘summer of cricket’ advertisements in
August. Hell, the Ashes is on in the middle of the year (only the biggest
cricket event of all time) and Channel 9 are having to ‘share’ the broadcast
rights with Fox Sports!
Let’s pretend the situation was
reversed though. It’s December and the Ashes are being contested in
Australia. Yet, there’s some landmark Rugby League game on – say, the
final between Australia and New Zealand. What gets broadcast on the main
Channel 9 channel? I’m thinking the League. For Channel 9, the
biggest Rugby League game would be considered more important than the biggest
cricket game, even if it was in primetime cricket season.
To me, that seals cricket’s fate
as an upper-mid tier sport, but no longer competing with the Big Two.
Richie Benaud will now light himself on fire.
Steve:
Ah, when politics
leads into cricket…makes me think of this:
Shot, Hawkie!
Cricket is on a different plane though. Unlike any of the football
codes, it’s a truly national sport. The Australian cricket captain is
always going to be a more well-known and influential figure than the captain of
the AFL All-Australian Team (which doesn’t even play any games), the Kangaroos
and Wallabies. In fact, who is the captain of the Wallabies at the
moment? Cricket also has more international appeal than the football
codes. Brett Lee is a god in India, Warnie gets more press in the UK than
Kate Middleton’s B-cups and Ricky Ponting’s toupee is a global E-Bay
phenomenon.
The other thing about the so-called decline of cricket is that people think we have some sort of divine right to field a side with multiple superstars all the time. Warne and McGrath were two of the top six or eight bowlers who ever lived, supported with batting geniuses like Waugh, Hayden, Ponting, Gilchrist & Langer. Players like this don’t just fall from the sky. The Cricket Academy was a world leader in the late 80s and early 90s (and produced most of our side from about 1995 onwards), but other countries have caught up. It’s to be expected that we don’t continue to win 16 Tests in a row every other year.
The other thing about the so-called decline of cricket is that people think we have some sort of divine right to field a side with multiple superstars all the time. Warne and McGrath were two of the top six or eight bowlers who ever lived, supported with batting geniuses like Waugh, Hayden, Ponting, Gilchrist & Langer. Players like this don’t just fall from the sky. The Cricket Academy was a world leader in the late 80s and early 90s (and produced most of our side from about 1995 onwards), but other countries have caught up. It’s to be expected that we don’t continue to win 16 Tests in a row every other year.
Speaking of Warnie, he gets it. He understands that cricket needs
controversy, excitement and showmanship. His spat with Marlon Samuels was
worth its weight in gold to the Big Bash League, and don’t let anyone tell you
otherwise. The man’s a genius. Long live Warnie.
Comments